I will be blogging live from this event. I will try and keep my comments accurate, well written and legible. I will edit them after the event too. All comments welcomed and please feel free to share with attribution and a link back to blog.kelf.co.uk .
Great introduction from Malcolm.
Engagement Through Partnership
Abbi Flint Consultant in Academic Practice (Students As Partners), Higher Education Academy @HEA_SaP
Introduction to keynote followed by an introduction to what the HEA is an do.
Student engagement does not have a common definition.
- What does ‘Partnership with students’ mean to you?
- Why are you interested in partnership in learning and teaching?
Three main perspectives of student engagement:
- Behavioural perspective
- Student behaviour
- Institutional practices
- Psychological perspectives
- Socio-cultural perspective
- Social context
Focus on Learning relationship as well as working arrangements
Partnerships among staff and students and students and students.
Exact form of partnership is contextual.
Partnership isn’t going to drop easily into existing processes. Need to take a step back.
Some areas are paying students to partner with academics to undertake research related to their subject (Subject-based research and inquiry)
Typical to have students evaluate a course but better to get students involved at the curriculum design phase. Typically paid. Typically challenging but can have great results is barriers are broken down.
Tensions and opportunities:
- Inclusivity and scale
- Who engages and who doesn’t
- Power Relationships
- Empowerment and responsibility are important but how does this work? How can power be shared between staff and students?
- Blurring identities
- Rethink the roles staff and students are typically put in.
- Don’t use ‘Students as’ as it infers that this isn’t part of their role but an add on.
- Terms of engagement
- Staff usually undertake as part of their paid role.
- Students this can be very different. This needs to be considered carefully.
- Pedagogies of partnership
- Learning from ‘failures’
- Ethical implications
Students As Partners
A good course / project / module should constantly be refreshing and changing through partnership with students and staff.
Lecture theatres would be empty if they existed at all – what does student partnership look like?
The staff voice is just as important in these partnerships and this needs to be remembered.
Should you look at bringing Alumni back to partner in the curriculum design / review process?
20% of audience have taken part in a partnership with students.
When you pay / reward students they are more likely to buy in to the idea of partnership and you’re more likely to get more engagement. Students will feel more valued and will usually result in much greater input.
Highlight how the partnership will benefit all involved.
Should all partners be inducted / shown how to engage in the partnership?
Strand A Sessions
Engaging Students at GCU: The Story So Far
Jim Emery & Stephanie Noble* Glasgow Caledonian University
Their structure for the student contribution to learning and teaching:
- Engaging students in their own learning and teaching
- Engaging students in the development of their learning and teaching
- Started to engage from 2nd year.
- Joined the student engagement committee
- Currently looking at things like:
- Social media policy
- Student Experience Summit
- Online assessment, feedback and submission
- No more tickbox consultation
- Widened participation
- Better representation of what is an extremely diverse student population
Strand B Sessions
Learning and Assessment with Social Media: A Case Study with ‘Manipulating Media’
Students saw assignments as separate to learning – more of a tickbox to get out of the way.
TESTA wanted to change and improve this.
first 6 week – 3hr lectures in a traditional lecture theatre.
then set up a blog -asked students t comment on a post about student recruitment. just under 50% engagement.
Students were asked and some wanted it in their VLE not wordpress so staff duplicated it.
Next students were asked to set up their own blog.
60% chose tumblr
required students to blog once a week minimum and there was a minimum length required.
Must be constructive comments if reflective on issues.
Created a Facebook Group for the class. one student didn’t like facebook but joined one week later after seeing the benefit offered to the other students.
Students who were strong ended up producing excessive amounts in their blogs as the score was so wide.
Staff created a twitter account for the course. Used this to distribute photos of in session created resources – e.g. whiteboard etc.
Groups were required to produce a short video (strictly <3 minutes long). Assigned roles with tasks to students. This allowed staff to better assess student input to the project.
Next each student was asked to produce a narrated powerpoint of 5 minutes – this was to replace and essay. This was then shown to class.
What did students get:
- Work goes out publically
- Using the tools they are more familiar with
- Ongoing feedback
Strand C Sessions
Using Open Badges to Encourage Student Participation in Class Rep Activities
Josephine Kinsley & Tanya Lubicz-Nawrocka* The University of Edinburgh
Each of the 22 schools has it’s own student rep structure.
Class reps gather students views and represent these at committees.
Class reps wanted more interaction and sharing of ideas. Also wanted more training.
Need to make students aware of the role and what is in it for them to become a rep.
Staff needed to be made more aware of the role and how to best engage with it.
- Providing more structure to the class rep role
- Helping class reps share their success stories
- being more accessible to all class reps
- acting as stepping stones for those who were working on the challenging Edinburgh Award
Firstly considered Bronze silver and gold level badge. But then went with a themed model after consultation with the students:
- Student Representation badges
- Research and Communication badges
- Student Development Badges
Strand D Sessions
Solutions for Detecting & Preventing Plagiarism A community session: SafeAssign and Turnitin – Discussion
Jonathan Knight Keele University +Jonathan Knight
Long list presented by Jon as to why this debate had been started at Keele.
Is there a debate at your institution?
discussion around size of comparison database size – Perceived Turnitin has larger of student papers
Discussion around the Tii integration methods. Agreed we need a better solution ASAP.
Discussion was around how Tii are keeping us updated – they’re not really, and what might get Tii to change how they are operating.
Interesting discussion around Tii requests to see matched student paper from other HEI – do we have the right to send a students work?
Confirmed – there is no limit on using SA within your current license.
Turnitin can put comments and grades in wrong submissions if multiple markers in same assignment and or with multiple papers open in different tabs.
Limit of 10mb on SafeAssign is being worked on currently.
Community created comparison list of features for SA and Tii:
(Please feel free to contribute anything that is missing)
Partnership: The Blackboard Perspective
Alan Masson Head of International Customer Success, Blackboard Inc
Reassurance that Blackboard is well used and love at your HEI.
Partnership support employability skills.
- Empowering Learners
- Recognising achievements
- Students as change agents
- Informing the enhancement conversation
Use of badges to help highlight achievements.
Enhanced Cloud Profile (MyEdu) to come
Students as change agents:
Students develop uni mobile app for students.
Student nominated awards for best on VLE
Students informing change:
Students involved in curriculum review process
Student performance data
Feedback from module evaluations
Focus on performance and satisfaction
BB looking at providing toolkits to help you facilitate an informing debate with your students.
Async v sync communication – needs to be considered in partnerships
BB Events to enable sharing:
- BUGs Events
- BB TLC
- BB world
- BB Catalyst Awards
- Reference Case Studies
Looking at country specific requirements
Available to run moocs for free
Contact account manager for user account
3 deployment options:
Instructor Grading App
iOS ONLY!!! 🙁
Offline student access [Beta] planned to start in January
Students download a zip of course inc. a viewer to make it look like they are still in BB
MyEdu Coming before June
students can currently use as a standalone tool
Once BB better integrate students will be able to move assets between VLE and My EDU to keep access after completion of course.
Issues with analytics when students are accessing content via mobile.
BB will be working on a solution.
Too early to give information.
“My EDU trying to make an academic LinkedIn”
From May you’ll be able to install BB Ultra as a self-service trial
Plan for July 2016 to upgrade to this.
New user interface – as user logs in they are taken to an activity timeline.
will be full drag-and-drop
New mobile learn app (student app) due in June 2015 – moving towards looking like new ultra design.
students will be able to submit assignments (to BB) from mobile device.
BB Grader app to become instructor app
New Collaborative experience.
Available from June 2015 in ver 1 form
Mobile app for full function to come around June
Strand E Sessions
Blurring The Boundaries: Putting Students at the Heart of Programme Delivery
Paul Scott, Aseem Mishra*& Edward Miller* Hull York Medical School
Drivers for more student Inclusion:
- AMEE (Aspire to Excellence)
- Curriculum Review, Changing Learning Landscape project
- Student demand, new Dean!
Students are on all key committees in the school (with exception where not appropriate)
Students are part of the e-learning team over the summer. help to check content and update it.
Developed app dedicated to supporting Hull York Medical students.
Not just a token gesture being on committee
Student feedback built in to agenda – not as last item at the end of the agenda.
Using a ‘You said – we did’ website to highlight impact of student partnership
Strand F Sessions
BB SITS integration for the transfer of grades
Should be out Jan / Feb 2015
Sync between BB Grade Centre and SIS
LIS 2.0 standard – http://www.imsglobal.org/lis/
Assessments in SIS create columns in BB Grade Centre
Once populated there is a grades approval and release to allow the grades back into the SIS
New role to be created to allow for the management of the return process.
Grade centre will be locked during approval process
After approval read only view in GC
Administrators to be provided with tools to spot exceptions, repair columns etc.
Tii grade change? no idea!
Read only on column or all? Still not sure!
Will admin tool to repair etc be in Jan? Yes.